[NukeNet] Nuclear Power Alternatives

The Roy Process theroyprocess at cox.net
Fri Aug 11 18:57:52 CDT 2006


F,
Email the author and/or Bill Smirnov who has a copy.

Regards,
Dennis
------------
Energy audit of nuclear fuel cycles  I have always maintain that ALL consumption vs. contribution equals zero. I could never prove it. How can I back it up !!
F
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: The Roy Process 
  To: Nukenet 
  Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 7:21 PM
  Subject: [NukeNet] Nuclear Power Alternatives


  NukeNet Anti-Nuclear Network (nukenet at energyjustice.net)




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  http://members.cox.net/theroyprocess 
  http://nuclearwaste-theroyprocess.blogspot.com/


  Nuclear Power Used Up More Energy
  Than It Delivered To Society !

  "At the end
  of forty years of the US nuclear power program
  by 1991, this energy- 381302 MW-yrs  -delivered to
  society is still less than the gross cumulative
  energy invested in nuclear plant construction and
  maintenance of 489174 MW-yrs! "

  Energy audit of nuclear fuel cycles 

      By R. Ashok Kumar,
  B.E,M.E(Power),Negentropist,Flat 1/13, Telec
  Officers' CHS.,Ltd.,Plot 30, Sector 17, Vashi,
  Navi Mumbai-400705. Tel:7896209.
  rakumra at yahoo.com

   <clip>
   It must be noted that a number of surprises
  have caused retrofits and replacements like the
  steam generator premature replacements and the
  replaced  radioactive steam generators enclosed in
  costly sarcophages worldwide. These have
  enormously increased the energy invested in these
  white elephants.
  -------------- 
  Wavemill Technology
  http://www.wavemill.com/technology.htm
  -------------
  New Solar  Power 
  SA solar research eclipses rest of the world 
  http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=116&art_id=vn20060211110132138C184427
  -------------
  Letter to the Editor,

  The aim of nuclear power is spent fuel rods (nuclear waste) from
  which weapons are made. Atom bombs, easier are dirty bombs,
  so-called depleted uranium ordinance, not electricity, That is why
  40 sovereign countries have nuclear power. 

  Dr. John Gofman says there is no safe dose of man-made ionizing
  radiation. We should not add to it with new nuclear power plants.
  Nuclear power is the most dangerous form of electricity. It is the
  heat which makes steam that powers electric generators. Albert 
  Einstein once said, "Nuclear power is one hell of a way to boil
  water".

  Liability is paid by the tax payer under the Price/Anderson Act.
  Electric rate payers subsidize nuclear power and waste disposal. 
  There is big money and political power in nuclear waste, in killing
  people, in a toxic regime. Nuclear power pollutes the environment
  and will not stop global warming according to studies.

  http://members.cox.net/theroyprocess 
  -----------------
  (Posted for educational and research purposes only,
   in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107). 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________________________________
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe Here: http://www.energyjustice.net/nukenet/
  Change your settings or access the archives at:
  http://mail.energyjustice.net/mailman/listinfo/nukenet_energyjustice.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/nukenet_energyjustice.net/attachments/20060811/5fa7a00d/attachment.html 


More information about the Nukenet mailing list