[NukeNet] US-India nuclear deal: CNIC article in Japan Times
Citizens' Nuclear Information Center
cnic at nifty.com
Mon Apr 16 00:49:44 EDT 2007
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/eo20070414a1.html
Saturday, April 14, 2007
Japan: Say no to India-U.S. nuclear deal
By PHILIP WHITE
Special to The Japan Times
The Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) is hardly a household name. The
proceedings of its meetings are secret and it doesn't even have its own
web site, but in recent months it has become the focus of more
attention than usual. The reason is that each of its 45 member
countries, including Japan, has veto power over a proposal to exempt
India from international rules restricting nuclear trade.
The issue came to a head in December last year when the U.S. Congress
amended its Atomic Energy Act to allow nuclear trade with India. The
legislation included several conditions, including making the deal
contingent on approval by the NSG. NSG decisions are made by consensus,
so that means that each member country has a power of veto.
The United States and India had hoped that the NSG would amend its
guidelines to allow the deal to proceed at its next plenary meeting,
which will be held in South Africa from April 16 to 19, but it now
seems likely that member countries will delay the decision until other
agreements are in place. A formal bilateral agreement between the U.S.
and India has to be worked out and India has to negotiate a safeguards
agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The deal places many NSG member countries between a rock and a hard
place. It has little to recommend it from the point of view of nuclear
disarmament and nonproliferation. Key nuclear facilities will remain
outside any safeguards agreement reached with the IAEA, and India has
repeatedly expressed its unwillingness to give ground on meaningful
issues, such as ending the production of fissile materials. However,
countries that are normally strong advocates of nuclear disarmament and
nonproliferation are reluctant to incur the wrath of the superpower.
For its part, the Indian government is sending high-level delegations
to lobby NSG countries that show any sign of resistance. Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh visited Japan in December last year and External Affairs
Minister Pranab Mukherjee visited in March. Their visits were a
recognition of Japan's important role in the NSG. So far, however, the
Japanese government has not committed itself one way or the other.
If any country is qualified to say no to the deal it is Japan. Besides
the history of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan has a strong record of
promoting nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation. India is not a
member of the Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) and it has no intention of
relinquishing its nuclear weapons, so the U.S.-India nuclear deal flies
in the face of Japan's long-held stance.
The deal is premised on the unrealistic assumption that the exception
will apply only to India.
However, Pakistan, supported by China, has demanded the same treatment.
Indeed, the deal risks provoking a nuclear arms race in South Asia.
Recognizing that India will be able to increase its production of
fissile material and nuclear weapons, Pakistan's National Command
Authority "expressed firm resolve that our credible minimum deterrence
requirements will be met." Furthermore, the deal will inevitably
complicate the process of reigning in the nuclear programs of countries
such as North Korea and Iran.
Endorsement of the U.S.-India nuclear deal would represent a great
reversal for the NSG. The group was established in 1975 largely in
response to a "peaceful" nuclear explosion conducted by India the year
before. And it is only nine years since the world was outraged by
nuclear weapons tests carried out by both India and Pakistan.
Japan should demonstrate international leadership by opposing this deal
in the NSG. It should take this opportunity to push India and the U.S.
to take meaningful steps toward genuine nuclear disarmament. The deal
on offer at the moment will only entrench the continuing existence of
nuclear weapons.
Philip White, an Australian, is the International Liaison Officer of
the Tokyo-based Citizens' Nuclear Information Center. He will represent
CNIC at the NGO events surrounding the NPT Preparatory Committee to
meet from April 30 to May 11 in Vienna)
The Japan Times
Citizens' Nuclear Information Center
3F Kotobuki Bdg, 1-58-15, Higashi-Nakano, Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164-0003
Phone: 81-3-5330-9520
Fax: 81-3-5330-9530
http://cnic.jp/english/
cnic at nifty.com
More information about the Nukenet
mailing list