[NukeNet] MFP challenges NRC "secrets"

[MoJo]

PRESS RELEASE

San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace
February 21, 2008
For immediate release


Contact:     Jane Swanson, spokesperson
              San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace
               Home phone (805) 595- 2605
              Cell phone (805) 440-1359
               janeslo at kcbx.net


On February 20, 2008, San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (MFP) attorney Diane Curran filed a brief with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) arguing for access to secret documents the NRC relied upon for its finding that a successful terrorist attack on the Diablo Canyon dry cask storage facility would have "no significant impact" on the environment.

Under federal law and consistent with longstanding NRC policy, MFP has a meaningful right to a hearing addressing the possible consequences of such a terrorist attack and protective measures that should be taken to avoid or mitigate those impacts. By denying MFP access to most of its supporting evidence, the NRC is not allowing MFP or the affected public to understand the reasons for the Staff's extremely surprising conclusion that the environmental impacts of a terrorist attack would be insignificant.

MFP spokesperson Jane Swanson expressed the group's concern that the NRC is using a secret and irrational analytical process to rule out attack scenarios with significant impacts.  "The NRC keeps secret documents with secret criteria for judging the credibility of intentional attacks and the severity of their consequences.   It is time for the NRC to stop playing games and to reveal to our attorney and expert, who have the appropriate security clearances, how it arrived at this irrational finding."

Some of the withheld documents are labeled "state secrets" by the NRC. However, the NRC has a history of circulating security-related documents to nuclear industry trade representatives as well as state and local government representatives. MFP argues that, before declaring that the documents are privileged "state secrets," the NRC Staff should be required to fully disclose the identities of the persons and organizations with which those documents have been shared.  And if the NRC Staff's disclosures show that the documents have been shared with PG&E or trade industry representatives, the Commission should also ensure that MFP has access to the same documents for purposes of participating in the Diablo Canyon dry cask storage licensing proceeding.   


BACKGROUND

The San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace in 2006 won a favorable ruling from the Ninth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals, determining that under the National Environmental Policy Act, the NRC was required to take into account the environmental effects of an intentional attack on the dry cask storage facility at Diablo Canyon.  The NRC response to that ruling was to declare, in an eight page Environmental Assessment, that there would be no significant impact from such an attack. MFP is challenging that conclusion and demanding a hearing and access to documents in order the force the NRC to meaningfully comply with the Ninth Circuit's ruling.
  

  TO SEE MFP FILING OF FEB. 20, see attached.
  


--   
  
Jane Swanson
  janeslo at kcbx.net



******************************************************************************************************************
   
  "It is worth noting that, in the USA alone, there are an estimated 45,000 sites which are polluted or potentially polluted by radioactive poisons --- according to a report commissioned by the Environmental Protection Agency in 1992 (see EPA 1992). Worldwide, there is radioactive pollution from above-ground bomb tests. There is also the radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl accident in Europe and the former USSR. The fact that humans have already created large amounts of nuclear pollution, adds to the moral argument for allowing no more."    http://www.ratical.com/radiation/CNR/YuccaMtnRWRP.html
  
 

       
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.energyjustice.net/pipermail/nukenet_energyjustice.net/attachments/20080222/f9d0f9d1/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: MFP Response to Vaughn .pdf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 146151 bytes
Desc: pat571236184
Url : http://mail.energyjustice.net/pipermail/nukenet_energyjustice.net/attachments/20080222/f9d0f9d1/attachment-0001.obj