[NukeNet] US-India Nuclear Deal: International Letter to NSG and IAEA
Citizens' Nuclear Information Center
cnic at nifty.com
Thu Jan 10 03:34:54 EST 2008
An international letter to governments on the NSG and the IAEA Board
of Governors , which was coordinated by Abolition 2000's US-India
Working Group, has been sent. The media release issued yesterday is
copied below.
The full text of the letter and all the signatories (now increased to
29 individual and 104 organizational endorsements) can be found on both
of the following web sites (note that the links might be broken in
transmission):
http://cnic.jp/english/topics/plutonium/proliferation/usindiafiles/
nsgiaea7jan08.html
http://www.armscontrol.org/pressroom/2008/NSGappeal.asp
Thanks to everyone who endorsed this letter. The media response has
been good. We hope that it will influence governments as well.
Philip White
-- Media Advisory --
Experts and Organizations from 23 Countries Call on States to
"Fix the Proposal for Nuclear Cooperation with India"
January 9, 2008
Contacts: Daryl Kimball, Exec. Director, Arms Control Association
1-202-463-8270 x107;
Philip White, Citizens' Nuclear Information Center, Tokyo and
Coordinator, Abolition 2000 U.S.-India Deal Working Group
81-3-3357-3800
(Washington, D.C.-Tokyo, Japan) In a letter sent to more than
four-dozen governments this week, a prestigious and broad array of more
than 120 experts and nongovernmental organizations from 23 countries
said the U.S. proposal to exempt India from longstanding global nuclear
trade standards "would damage the already fragile nuclear
nonproliferation system and set back efforts to achieve universal
nuclear disarmament."
The international appeal to "Fix the Proposal for Nuclear Cooperation
with India" calls upon governments "to play an active role in
supporting measures that would ensure this controversial proposal does
not: further undermine the nuclear safeguards system and efforts to
prevent the proliferation of technologies that may be used to produce
nuclear bomb material," or "in any way contribute to the expansion of
India's nuclear arsenal."
Among the experts endorsing the appeal is Amb. Jayantha Dhanapala, the
former UN Under-Secretary General for Disarmament Affairs and President
of the 1995 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Review and Extension
Conference. Nongovernmental organizations from South Asia, East Asia,
Australia and New Zealand, Europe, Africa, and North America endorsed
the letter, which was organized by the Tokyo-based Citizens' Nuclear
Information Center and the Washington-based Arms Control Association.
In the coming weeks, the 35-member International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA) Board of Governors and the 45-member Nuclear Suppliers Group
(NSG) will likely take up the issue. The appeal is part of a global NGO
campaign to influence governments' views about the controversial
nuclear trade proposal.
Current international guidelines severely restrict trade with states,
such as India, that do not allow comprehensive international safeguards
over all nuclear facilities and material in their territory. The 1968
nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) bars direct or indirect
assistance of another state's nuclear weapons program. India, which
detonated a nuclear bomb in 1974 made with plutonium harvested from a
Canadian and U.S.-supplied reactor in violation of bilateral peace
nuclear use agreements, has not to joined the NPT, continues to produce
fissile material for nuclear weapons, and has not signed the
Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).
Nevertheless, in July 2005, U.S. President George Bush pledged to seek
changes in longstanding U.S. laws and international guidelines to
permit increased civil nuclear trade with India. In return, Indian
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh pledged to allow additional IAEA
oversight of certain Indian nuclear reactors under a new
"India-specific" agreement now being negotiated with the Agency.
"Contrary to the claims of its advocates," the signatories write, "the
proposed arrangement fails to bring India into conformity with the
nonproliferation behavior expected of other states. India's commitments
under the current terms of the proposed arrangement do not justify
making far-reaching exceptions to international nonproliferation rules
and norms."
Noting that the IAEA Board and the NSG traditionally operate by
consensus, the signatories also note that each member state "has a
pivotal role to play." The appeal calls upon the governments to
consider additional conditions and restrictions on nuclear trade with
India.
Among other recommendations, the appeal urges governments "to actively
oppose any arrangement that would give India any special safeguards
exemptions or would in any way be inconsistent with the principle of
permanent safeguards over all nuclear materials and facilities." India
is reportedly seeking IAEA safeguards that could allow India to cease
IAEA scrutiny if nuclear fuel supplies are cut off - even it that is
because it renews nuclear testing.
The appeal insists that NSG states "should under no circumstances"
allow for the transfer to India of plutonium reprocessing, uranium
enrichment or heavy water production technology, which may be
replicated and used to help produce nuclear bomb material. India is
seeking access to these sensitive technologies from the United States
and other suppliers.
Noting that the nuclear cooperation proposal could help India expand
its nuclear weapons arsenal, the appeal also urges governments to
insist that India "join the original nuclear weapon states by declaring
it has stopped fissile material production for weapons purposes and ...
make a legally-binding commitment to permanently end nuclear testing."
The appeal argues that "in the very least," NSG states should "clarify
that all nuclear trade shall immediately cease if India resumes nuclear
testing for any reason." To do otherwise "would undercut the
international norm against nuclear testing and make a mockery of NSG
guidelines," according to the supporters of the appeal.
For the full text of the appeal to "Fix the Proposal for Nuclear
Cooperation with India" and list of endorsers, see
<www.armscontrol.org/pressroom/2008/NSGappeal.asp>
# # #
The Arms Control Association (ACA) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit
membership organization based in Washington, D.C. Established in 1971,
ACA provides information and analysis on weapons-related security
challenges and practical solutions to address them. ACA publishes the
monthly journal, Arms Control Today.
More information about the Nukenet
mailing list