[NukeNet] Clean, Safe Nuclear Power and drinking water

[Russell Honicker]

*Agency: Homestake site
'public health hazard'*


Strong winds carry misted water through the air and toward Hwy 605 at the
Homestake mining site near Milan, NM. on Wednesday. [photo by Jeff Jones /
Independent]

*ATSDR recommendations:*

   - Residents who have moved to the area since 1995 of the contamination in
   the wells and advise those who are using well water to have their water
   tested;
   - Residents who are not using the alternate source of drinking water to
   have their wells sampled, to use bottled water;
   - Residents who have vegetable gardens should wash the vegetables
   thoroughly before eating them;
   - Determine why uranium concentrations are increasing in the Middle
   Chinle aquifer;

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry report is available at:

http://www.epa.gov/earth1r6/6sf/pdffiles/nm_homestake_
mining_company_atsdr_rpt.pdf and also at the
UNM-Grants Library, 1500 3rd St., or from ATSDR, 1-888-422-8737.

By Kathy Helms
Diné Bureau

WINDOW ROCK — The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry has
concluded that the Homestake Mining Co. mill site in Milan is a public
health hazard.

The agency has extended the public comment period on its findings through
July 3 after a delay in the report's delivery.

The federal public health agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services evaluates the human health effects of exposure to hazardous
substances.

The Homestake mill opened in 1958 and processed uranium for approximately 30
years. It closed in 1990, leaving behind two tailings piles which have
contaminated the alluvial groundwater aquifer. The larger pile covers 200
acres and is about 100 feet high; the smaller pile covers 40 acres and is 25
feet high.

Groundwater monitoring data indicate that contamination from tailings
seepage has affected the San Mateo alluvial aquifer and the Upper, Middle,
and Lower Chinle aquifers.

The San Mateo is the primary aquifer of concern because it is the most
contaminated and it recharges the Chinle aquifers, which subdivision
residents have used as a source of drinking water.

Approximately 200 people live within a mile of the tailings piles. Five
residential subdivisions — Felice Acres, Broadview Acres, Murray Acres,
Valle Verde, and Pleasant Valley Estates — are located between a half-mile
to 2 miles from the tailings piles, with the nearest residence and drinking
water well about 3,000 feet away.

Residential wells in the subdivisions were sampled for radionuclides,
chemicals, and metals beginning in the mid-1970s, though only a few were
sampled consistently.

Sample results indicated elevated concentrations of uranium, selenium, and
molybdenum.

The state of New Mexico's standard for uranium in groundwater was changed in
June 2007 from 5,000 parts per billion to 30 ppb following a state Court of
Appeals ruling. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's maximum contaminant
level, or level considered safe for uranium in groundwater is 30 ppb and has
been since 2000.

Linda Evers and her family, who live in Broadview Acres about a half-mile
from the Homestake site, were included in the Homestake/Village of Milan
water hookup in April 1985 which resulted from a consent decree between EPA
and Homestake.

The company was required to provide an alternate water supply for well
owners after contamination was found in wells downgradient from the site.

"Everybody around here is like, 'Well, finally! That took long enough.' When
you go from 5,000 parts per billion to 30 parts per billion, and before 2000
there was no drinking water standard for uranium, it's like, 'Wow, really?'"
Evers said

Monday evening, regarding the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry 's public health hazard designation.
Homestake was placed on the EPA Superfund National Priorities List in
September 1983 due to concerns about radon emissions from the tailings
piles. Cleanup of the contaminated aquifers has been ongoing since 1977.

During sampling by EPA and the New Mexico Environment Department in
September 2005, the agencies found that about two-thirds of the wells, or 22
out of 34, had uranium concentrations above the maximum contaminant level.
The maximum uranium concentration detected was 849 ppb, as opposed to the 30
ppb standard.

Residents who accepted the 1985 offer for village of Milan water and used it
as their sole source of water eliminated their exposure to the contaminated
well water. If residents continued to use their well water, which some did,
for drinking, showering, watering gardens and lawns, they were potentially
exposed to the contaminants, the agency said.

The agency did not have any vegetable or soil sample results to determine
what the contaminant levels were in the vegetables, and therefore doesn't
know what levels people may have been exposed to via this route.

The amount of uranium, selenium, and molybdenum ingested would depend upon
how often they consumed vegetables, if they used contaminated well water to
irrigate the vegetables, and if the vegetables were thoroughly cleaned prior
to eating them.

Because no institutional controls have been established, residents have had
the option of using the contaminated groundwater for irrigation purposes and
to provide water for their livestock.

Adverse health effects in livestock would have been more likely to occur in
the 1970s-1990s compared to what they are exposed to presently, because
concentrations were much higher in the past, the agency said.

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry reviewed over 30 years
of sampling results and found that ongoing remediation has helped in
reducing the levels of contaminants. However, sampling results from the past
three years indicate that uranium and selenium concentrations are above
their respective drinking water standard and will most likely be above them
upon completion of the remedial actions.

Lack of consistent monitoring over the years, the considerable concentration
differences in wells within the same aquifer, the unknown usage of wells
during the alternate water supply period, and anomalies with the sampling
data are all factors that make past exposures an indeterminate health
hazard, the agency said.

Because exposure is still possible in some of the private wells, ATSDR has
categorized the Homestake site as a public health hazard.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.energyjustice.net/pipermail/nukenet_energyjustice.net/attachments/20080604/8a9ec42a/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 17887 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.energyjustice.net/pipermail/nukenet_energyjustice.net/attachments/20080604/8a9ec42a/attachment-0002.jpe 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 15737 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.energyjustice.net/pipermail/nukenet_energyjustice.net/attachments/20080604/8a9ec42a/attachment-0001.gif 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 9312 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.energyjustice.net/pipermail/nukenet_energyjustice.net/attachments/20080604/8a9ec42a/attachment-0003.jpe