Windfarms More Efficient than Biofuels?

- by Aidan Har­ri­son, Decem­ber 5, 2014, Northum­ber­land Gazette

Its obses­sion with ‘mar­kets’ has already placed our rail­ways and util­i­ties in the hands of big for­eign state and cor­po­rate-owned monopolies.

The first thing to make clear is that the tech­nol­o­gy of wind pow­er is noth­ing like as inef­fi­cient as its fanat­i­cal detrac­tors claim.

In terms of ener­gy returned on ener­gy invest­ed (EROEI), it is bet­ter than nuclear and shale gas, yet safe and clean.

It is infi­nite­ly more ener­gy-effi­cient than util­is­ing good farm­land for bio­fu­el pro­duc­tion. Nine­ty-sev­en per cent of the dash for tur­bines is out­side the UK, with such polit­i­cal­ly diverse places as Chi­na, Chile and Texas pil­ing into wind pow­er. Can the rest of the world real­ly be so wrong?

The lat­est fig­ures show that in Octo­ber, Scotland’s wind tur­bines pro­duced more Kw/hrs than the coun­try consumed.

Yes, they receive tax­pay­er sup­port, but only a tiny frac­tion of the mon­ey which our Gov­ern­ment has promised to France and Com­mu­nist Chi­na for build­ing two nuclear pow­er sta­tions in Somerset.

In the more gen­uine democ­ra­cies, wind­farms and oth­er renew­ables are read­i­ly accept­ed because they are much more under the con­trol of local com­mu­ni­ties who, in turn, ben­e­fit from the cheap pow­er they produce.

In con­trast, our Gov­ern­ment has devised an anti-local, anti-demo­c­ra­t­ic sys­tem where the big, for­eign cor­po­ra­tions installing them give some of our tax mon­ey to the (often absen­tee) landown­er. It is hard­ly sur­pris­ing that local com­mu­ni­ties who receive no ben­e­fit resent their imposition.

It is dis­grace­ful that so much of the mon­ey added to our ener­gy bills to sup­port renew­ables only ben­e­fits already wealthy landown­ers for wind tur­bines and also those with large coun­try hous­es and adjoin­ing cot­tages who are the lucky minor­i­ty able to meet the tight cri­te­ria ‘enti­tling’ them to large sums from ordi­nary people’s bills to warm their chilly man­sions with bio­mass heat­ing systems.

Why, Ms Truss? She was accom­pa­nied on her vis­it by anti-wind cam­paign­er and Con­ser­v­a­tive prospec­tive can­di­date Anne-Marie Trevelyan.

I agree with Ms Trevelyan’s state­ment that ‘it is an entire­ly unac­cept­able sit­u­a­tion affect­ing the poor­est the most as they strug­gle to pay their fuel bills’.

I only hope that she has stuck to her prin­ci­ples and is not among those own­ers of state­ly homes who have accept­ed large amounts of pub­lic mon­ey to finance 25 years of cosy warmth from their vast bio­mass boil­ers at the expense of ‘the poor man at the gate’ who has to pick up the tab for their lux­u­ry and com­fort through the enhanced ener­gy bills she mentions.


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Related Projects

Watch Us on YouTube